How one great organization has lost its way in protection of human rights violations? And what is the path forward?
By now, the United Nations only have five permanent members and ten non-permanent members, five of which are elected each year. Which is by far biased beyond measure. It has always been, since the founding stages, that it was Western biased and it has been created to enable the influence of the United States all over the world. Some even called it, the United States of the World. This is why it has been created and it is why it has failed to achieve its goal to be the protector of human rights. So far, the United Nations have painted a rather bloodied image on the world in the name of protecting human rights. This is when the NATO countries went on their human rights protecting and peace keeping missions. With weapons.
You can see how these two organisations operate. The moment the UN points towards human rights violations and urges the political leaders to act, it is the NATOs role and the role of US and European countries to go to where the violations have happened and fight against human rights violations. How do we do this? With guns. This is the moment when the United Nations point the finger at NATO and the politicians that have been supporting the wars that they should have pulled out, while at the same time they have been the ones continuously promoting the war (example of Arabic countries) by engaging their human rights activists and placing pressure on countries, as well as politicians in the name of protecting against human rights violations to continue the wars and real human rights violations.
In the moment human rights violations happened, it was the practice of United Nations to throw the disputed party out. While as an external observer it may even seem counter intuitive to throw the disputed party out, in the moment of conflict, since that’s exactly where we need to maintain bridges to continue to promote and negotiate peace. This may be the most appropriate way of creating peace, however it is important that in that moment we keep them in, in order to continue negotiating peace, to giving them the stand to present their case and to even be put on trial. I understand why we throw the disputed parties out of the United Nations in the moment they have violated the human rights, however this may actually be beneficial for the disputed party, since it widens the dispute.
The purpose of the United Nations is that it may become the umbrella to provide and maintain peace among countries without allowing the other countries to use their armies in their peace making missions. Since this can provide opportunities for escalation among member states and it may prolong the conflict. Through consistent negotiations, and threats on what it may happen, if they continue to violate human rights, while at the same time keeping them inside during the time of conflict and if needed putting them on trial for human rights violations in front of all the member states. So far, the United Nations have at the start of the conflict often times threw the disputed party out, without even allowing us to listen to the oppressor.
It has than prevented any options for dispute negotiation, the pressing of charges or any other way to negotiate the dispute. Example, in the start of the Ukraine war the countries had in the first moment destroyed all lines of communication by throwing the Russia out of the United Nations, pulled out the companies generating billions or trillions of losses to the US and European companies (instead of Russian companies), instead of actually continuing to negotiate the dispute, threatening what may happen, if they don’t pull out of the Ukraine and step by step reshaping the Russian oppression over the Ukraine even internally. This has created the inflation and the energetic crisis and a division that is harder to overcome than before. When you are negotiating the dispute you should strive that you have a better BATNA (best alternative to negotiated agreement).
In this case, the countries have lost their BATNA, by destroying their lines of communication and jumping to the worst possible scenario. While, they would need to work hard to get the Russia back and enter the Russian market, so they were unable to resolve the dispute. In this way, the Russia had a better BATNA, because the EU and US countries would need to work really hard to get the Russia to allow them to enter the Russian market. But first, try to negotiate the dispute.
However, the problem of the United Nations is far reaching and the things are very concerning. It extends beyond what happened in the Ukraine war. The United Nations were one of the main organisations engaged in the war on terror, to protect the human rights and fight against human rights violations. The moment that the human rights violations happened (if they did at all and this wasn’t just a way to promote war in the Arabic countries), the United Nations were always there to respond and promote fight against human rights violations. However, how have we been protecting human rights so far? With guns. In this way we may be or are even a lot worse than those that have started with the human rights violations.
One of the reasons why, United Nations were formed after and in-between the world war two, it has been to prevent another “Hitler” from rising to power and to prevent human rights violations such as those who have violated the rights of jews. In the past, in the moment the United Nations pointed towards human rights violations, the NATO countries became engaged in the solution towards peace or prevention of human rights violations. In that moment the disputed party is often thrown out of the United Nations, and it is in that moment NATO is engaged as the peace keeper and “human rights protector”. Nevertheless, the way NATO can resolve disputes is by going to war. In this way, the messengers for peace (United Nations) became the messengers for war. And the messengers for war (NATO) became the messengers for peace. But to wash the blood of their hands the United Nations often pointed onto politicians that continued to support the war, while at the same time called for fighting against human rights violations (and by doing so continuously promoted the wars).
This has happened in all the disputes since the foundation of the United Nations. An example, of this is the war in Afghanistan and other Arabic countries, such as Syria, Iraq, and Libya. When it has been believed that there are weapons of mass destruction in Afghanistan, or that the chemical weapons have been used to fight the unrest on people in Syria. While we don’t even know what was actually happening on the ground. In that moment, instead of engaging the law and to trying arrest those who have committed wrong or moreover actually ask them to present their case on what has been happening on the ground at the United Nations. We could engage the law by working with the local police to arrest or bring those in power who we think have committed wrong to the court of justice. But instead of doing that they have cut all lines of communication with the disputed party, which is the worst case scenario, if you are trying to negotiate the dispute. John F. Kennedy said that ““Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate.”
For 20+ years nobody cared about the largest genocide ever committed in human history against the children of Allah. Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, Libya and Palestine. The war that the US started and EU supported in their fight against the human rights violations. In that moment when supposedly the human rights violations started the US and EU countries (mostly NATO countries) came with their “weapons of mass destruction”. They bombed civilians. Not the terrorists mostly. Millions of people displaced. Losing their home, their income. Put into new age “concentration camps” (called refugee camps) designed to continue the funding for the United Nations, where refugees are living now for much longer than the jews and victims of holocaust lived during the world war two. There is shortage of food, clean water, there is no heating or insulation to protect the refugees against the winters. Locked up with no hope for a better future and with no home. Why do they have to put up with this crap? Why don’t they have the right to say no? The war that never ends and just continues, even though at least the taliban, we know for certain have on several occasions wanted to make peace.
During the war on terror the United Nations have censored anybody (especially from Arabic countries) who dared to speak up against the US and EU countries for the fear of promoting terrorism. We talk about protecting free speech, while at the same we blocked and censored talibans and mostly Arabs from speaking up against the war on “terror” in the fear of spreading terrorism. Six months ago, even I have been afraid to speak up and say what was happening. What about the terror Afghanistanian children saw when the US and NATO countries came with their weapons of mass destruction? They have been continuously censored and they didn’t even had the right to a lawyer, while the human rights lawyers have continuously promoted the human rights violations. Obama threw them in the worst prisons imaginable that were inhumane after they didn’t do much wrong, just standing up to the US that was attacking them with guns.
Nobody, stood up to the United States and the European countries and their war on “terror”. What about the true terror they saw when the US and EU countries came with their guns, tanks, bombs, mines, war planes and now drones. They didn’t even have someone to fight against anymore. Nobody wants to have their hands bloody with their own soldiers but they have them with the civilians, men, women and children of Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, and Iraq in their path to fight against human rights violations. They were silenced and weren’t even allowed to speak in the fear of promoting terrorism. Nobody was allowed to say anything against the war on terror and censorship on social media. In the moment, that human rights violations happen we block the accounts of the ones who violated the human rights violations, while we keep “ours” even though we commit worse human rights violations then them. What about the national sovereignty the US and European countries violated when they attacked these countries to “protect their human rights”.
And then we say, if they would be good they would stay there and fight. Fight against who? The US? The terrorists? A lot of them stay there and fight, they are called their freedom fighters. The terrorists. Or they can fight for the US and become killers like us. And they don’t like that either. So they leave. Then what God was doing here was killing the US solidiers. Not to say the amount of civilian lives lost and the lives lost of the Afghan soliders who supported the war against the taliban. That’s why they have PTSD. That’s why so many of them committed suicide. They hated what the US and them (agents of God/peace makers) have done to them. The role of the propaganda is to make us forget that the other side is human. They (We) were all brothers and sisters before God and were separated by war and extensive propaganda. We think that when something bad happens we need to fight fiercely to prevent escalation, to prevent bad things from happening. That we need to kill “the devil” and we need to do it fast and on all fronts. The more we push the greater the “angels” we become. The more blood on our hands we have. This is the moment when we become the “devil” and them the “angels”.
The United Nations were fighting for the right to support different religious beliefs, however the taliban have been believed to be the “devil worshipers”, because they wanted their women to cover themselves but most importantly, because they believed that the US and probably the UN were evil (“the devil”). They have been told in their mosques and schools, that the fight of their fathers who bravely fought against the US and EU, which came with their guns and their weapons of mass destruction were evil beyond measure. Telling them they are protecting them against their enemy, that they were protecting their women children. What women and children? The amount of women and children killed by the US and EU and other countries that supported the war is much larger than the amount of children killed by the taliban.
Nobody asked themselves why they bombed mosques and schools. They were consistently told in their schools and churches or mosques that they were fighting “the devil” that they were fighting in the name of God. We all wanted the United States that came with their guns in the name of fighting for democracy and corrupted politicians to presume the influence over their region. We saw them as white and the taliban as black. All that the EU and US countries did is that they have thought children in schools that the way towards peace is through killing their brothers and sisters in the name of democracy. That they have to kill to protect human rights. In the war that never ends. And that the only way out is through death. We don’t know what the Afghanistanian children were going through when their parents were killed in the name of God and than they were told they were the devil worshipers when they fought bravely against the largest army in the world. The fiercer we fight against the devil, the greater the devil we may become.
The US and European countries came with their guns and weapons. Telling them they are protecting them against their enemy, while they were killing their brothers and sisters. The problem is, and this comes from the World War two and also from Christian religion. Since, the world war two we think that we need to kill or fight against Hitlers of this world with guns. That we need to kill before we get killed. And that we need to do it fast. That we need to fight against evil, that we need to kill the devil and the evil people. That we need to send the devil and “devil worshipers”, which are nazis, and talibans, maybe even Russians to hell. That people are not naturally inclined to do and be good. That we need to send the devil to hell. But we don’t.
This is (and was) in the minds of all the US and Afghan soldiers that they are fighting against “evil people”, maybe even inside the Ukrainian soldiers. And it was the same in the taliban soldiers, because of what the US and European countries did to them and to their peaceful country. Something like this may be even in Russians, that are killing Ukrainian soldiers. Due to propaganda, they might have been made to believe that the Russians in Ukraine are oppressed by the Ukrainians. In this way we forget that the other side is human. We think we are angels before God, we think we are agents of peace, but we are agents of war. The true peace keepers are often the devil advocates, even those we thought we should never support, such as the taliban.
There is a simple explanation why so many nazis killed the jews. It wasn’t only that they were evil, but they might have also been brainwashed in the same way we were in the war on terror that they firmly believed that the jews were the devil worshipers, that they were evil. But they weren’t. We don’t know both sides of the stories. We point fingers at the politicians, but we don’t try to communicate with them or by reshaping and continuously talking for example with Russians to try and educate them what is happening on the other side. Or most importantly, we only see one side of the story. We haven’t allowed the Putin to speak about the war in Ukraine. We don’t know why some conflicts happened. Only that evil people did them.
Nobody asked themselves, except probably some Afghanistanians and Arabs why the 9/11 happened. Maybe it was a response to the Afghanistanian war, and justice for what the US and EU did to Afghanistan when they came with their weapons of mass destruction in the search of weapons of mass destruction. Should we bomb the US because they have the weapons of mass destruction? Nobody allowed the Arabs to speak against the injustices. We need to understand that this war lasted already 10 years before the 9/11 happened. We were so firmly brainwashed that the taliban are evil that we believed that in order to protect the womens rights we need to kill their men, their children and even their women to achieve that.
While those few taliban who were standing up to them, were tortured and their human right violated just to tell them the location of one man. How many times a child or a woman was killed to prevent them to say to the taliban about the location of NATO soldiers or in fear of a terrorist attack? Or how many times they killed innocent civilians because they weren’t sure, if they were taliban, terrorists or not. How many women cried because their children weren’t killed by the taliban but by the US and EU? We all saw this. We all supported this. Or probably most of us. But those who didn’t were called opposing the women and children rights. Because we all believed that the taliban are evil. That they are the devil. That they hurt women and children. While we the agents of God killed more women and children, not to say men. Do we as women really need to promote the killing of our men to protect our women rights? How many times did we pray to send the “devil” and “devil worshipers” that were the brave taliban soldiers to hell? Instead of telling God no we won’t do this. They are human too, even if they are so destroyed by the hopelessness of their situation that they need to kill themselves to let the God see the injustices committed to their country and them. When we tell them that the only pathway to peace is through killing.
Probably, the amount of women and children killed by the taliban is close to 0 (they might tried to kill one and that one got the Noble prize, which then continued to promote the war on terrorism and supported the fight for human rights), while the amount of children killed by the US and European, as well as even Russia or China is enormous. We think we did good when we got Russia and China on board but we don’t. They were all fighting against the imaginary devil. Nobody. Asked themselves why terrorism occurred? What was the message they tried to give. Or even if we knew “that they hated the US and EU” we never asked ourselves why? If that was even them and not God trying to make them see what was happening in Afghanistan.
Nobody dared to say that the terrorists should be allowed to speak at their trial. Nobody. Not even me. They weren’t allowed to a lawyer that might have proved that they didn’t do anything wrong. They weren’t allowed to criticise the work of the United Nations who has continued to promote the war in the name of women rights and to prevent child marriages. When the taliban bombed the UN convoys everyone pointed the fingers at the taliban and how evil they are. The UN who “didn’t do anything”, but promote the democracy, human rights and education. The angels. How can they be so cruel? God forbid anybody would say or do something against the United Nations, that were sometimes trafficking guns instead of the food supply or medicine that was very needed. Why do we need guns to promote women rights? Who gets funding from refugee camps. Why can’t we fight through words, through negotiations, or through education. Not an education that is solely western biased and makes us forget to believe that the other side is human and that the only path towards protecting human rights is by killing and supporting the US that killed most of the talibans. But through education that tells us we need to love our brothers and sisters and that it is a sin to kill a human being no matter what religion or nationality they belong to.
Everybody pointed the fingers at the taliban as horrific and UN as angels. Why are they so evil? We don’t know the truth. We don’t know their side of the story. We think that, if somebody points fingers at another for being bad, that these people become good, very good fighting against the “devil” just like God. That they are the angels. The democrats against the republicans. The left towards the right. In the moment we are fighting the “devil” we become angels in the eyes of the people. But it’s not necessarily true. The US soldiers as white heros, while the taliban soldiers as black and the devil worshipers. We may fall into a trap that we become a lot worse then them. But God knows the truth. We need to let evil live and even allow them to do good, so we can become true angels before God.
They were never allowed to speak against the US and European countries, they weren’t allowed to fight against anyone. Nobody, asked themselves what in the right mind made somebody believe they would go to heaven, if they killed or performed the terrorist attempt? I am not promoting one, however maybe they thought they were fighting against the devil (the US and those who supported the US, which may be in some case also civilians). I think we all knew this, but none of us truly cared. The US was an angel and the taliban the devil. In this case the Afghanistanian soldiers were the collaborators. Then in the moment when an Afghanistanian soldiers switched sides to be with the taliban and even terrorists everyone pointed fingers at how evil they are. But none of us cared or asked ourselves why they switched sides or we knew this but we just didn’t care. Maybe they saw through the US and EU. Maybe they felt sick that they were killing their own brothers and sisters in the name of “foreign God”.
The problem, of social psychology and Zimbardos experiment and even other experiments, such as Asch and Milgram is that they believed that we can all conform to a dictator because we are evil, or because nobody stands up to an evil character such as Hitler. Yes, standing up to them is good. But we need to understand why, they are able to extend their influence beyond what we believe is ok. What allows them to commit horrendous acts. Yes, it is not just Germans that can commit the horrendous attacks, even the people in US, Europe, China or Russia, or anywhere around the world we are able to commit horrible acts in the name of doing good. I think, sometimes in these countries we are even more likely to commit evil, because we think we need to do good and to fight against evil.
Even Obama committed such horrendous acts as Hitler, maybe even worse. The war in all the Arabic countries lasted longer than the world war two, as it was present for two of his presidential terms, besides Iraq and Afghanistan (which they continued even though they said they won’t in the name of human rights protection) they started the war in Libya, Syria and Ukraine. Obama probably killed and tortured more (“Allah believers”) than any other US president just for the location of one man (Ossama Bin Laden, who could have even been innocent).
In the war against terror there have been more taliban or civilians killed or tortured just for the location of one man. However, have they stopped there? They won the war on terror, they did what they came there to do. The US has finally done what it came to the Iraq and Afghanistan to do. But have they stopped there? No. They pushed even harder. The points of support skyrocketing, and just when they should have stopped the war they continued. They pushed even harder to finish the war. Which is a mistake that most of us could make. They pushed to win the war on terror even harder. To make peace. The moment we try to be the angel, we become the devil and often times the devil is actually a greater of an angel than the angels. The greater the angel we try to become the more the devil we are. The fact, is when something like a war starts it is a trick question for the politicians and those in power. What to do? And we usually respond by giving fire arms and guns or by bombing even more, (usually civilians). We think that to get to peace we need to win the war. While we know that there are no winners or losers in war. Only losers.
And yes, maybe the taliban wanted their women to be covered or not. But we never needed to kill anyone to try an change them. Much more could be achieved through the power of communication, negotiation, mostly business and law. A real human rights lawyer or activist doesn’t need guns. I am pretty sure, nobody is this crazy that they would like to kill to keep their women covered (except us). It should be their choice. The US has enough money and power to negotiate an arrangement that would enable the women to be covered in the way they would want to and human rights activists can definitely put or negotiate the law that would allow them to protect women, child rights and for this we don’t have to go to war or continue going to war.
This trap that we as humans are evil can lead you to commit horrendous acts. We all believe based on Christian religion and even though we believe that other religions are different they aren’t necessarily that different. That we need to kill the devil. That we need to send the devil worshipers to hell. That those who commit evil are the devil. We need to start with understanding. We need to be the devil advocates sometimes too. Not only the angels or the victims advocates. It may tip things differently, but we must fight through communication. God says that those who have been demoted will be promoted. If we want to win against someone who has started the war or oppressed us, maybe we need to reduce ourselves and than we will come first. We can stand up to them in non-violent means.
But we must not judge even the Afghanistanians who supported the US. They all thought they were doing good. They all believed they were doing good before God. Maybe in this case, the table turned to the taliban, and now the Afghanistanians that supported the US would be believed as “nazi” supporters in the name of human rights. But we must not forget, the difference between the propaganda. How strong your belief that you are doing good is. They were all told they were angels before God for fighting against the “devil” the taliban. When the fiasco in Afghanistan happened we all thought the devil was let loose and that this will be a terrible day for the human rights of women and children, as well as those who supported the US. That there will be more terrorist attempts? Where they would be recruiting children to attack the US. Why? They got what they wanted. There was no reason for war.
This trap that we as humans are evil can lead you to commit horrendous acts. And even though we believe that other religions are different they aren’t necessarily that different. I think a lot of religions teach that we need to fight against evil people. That we need to kill the devil. That we need to send the devil worshipers to hell. That those who commit evil are the devil. We need to start with understanding. We need to be the devil advocates sometimes too. Not only the angels or the victims. It may tip things differently, but we must fight through communication. God says that those who have been demoted will be promoted. If we want to win against someone who has started the war or oppressed us, maybe we need to reduce ourselves and than we will come first. We can stand up to them in non-violent means. That’s how we will become angels.
Everyone knows that going to war in Iraq was a mistake, but the politicians still supported it and nobody stopped it. But when 9/11 happened everyone pointed the finger at the George W. Bush because he stayed at the children hospital thinking those 7 minutes hoping things haven’t been that bad. The pressure put on him to go to war was enormous, but at the same time we all point fingers at him for going to war. Nobody asked themselves what was truly going through his mind when that happened. Maybe his thoughts drifted to Afghanistan and what his father did. In this moment we are all looking for retribution for justice for what has happened. But in order to gain a Nobel prize, George W. Bush should have negotiated the pull out of Afghanistan and talk with the taliban to give them the names of those responsible for the attack. And if this wouldn’t be possible let it go for a while and not seek retribution. Potentially, even pull out of Afghanistan all together.
We don’t have to kill the devil to create peace. Maybe we should let the evil live. It is tricky how to do this, but I think its possible. But we often times need to look at ourselves in the mirror and realize that we are often the problem too. Moreover, they (the US), EU and other countries that supported it have not came back to repair the damage they have done. Just because the EU and the US have been the winners of the world war two, that doesn’t mean they can go around killing in other countries to stop the human rights violations, because this was the way we did it during the world war two. These countries should be brought back to pay for the damages, like Germany had to after the war. But the damage of these failed countries, emotional damages, the souls lost, the brain drain, the people displaced. And nobody to respond to these problems. Can never be returned.
We must hear stories, we must strive towards listening, towards negotiating, towards talking, and towards empathy. To all even to the those who we believe are the oppressor and the victim. It took me a long time to try to voice this but we have to. Then we must act. But mostly, all countries should pledge for peace, as this is our gift to God to show that we are all good and that we are not only sinners but also agents of peace, of mercy, of forgiveness, of condolences and understanding. The way to fight against the oppressor is through love. To end the war in Ukraine the Ukranians should stop killing and lift the white flags and than fight through court to get their disputed territories back.
We were all observing what the US did. Saying that it is just the US in Afghanistan and other countries. But its time we stop this. The peace maker should not be just one country or a group of countries who have the responsibility to protect us against the human rights violations or evil people from rising to power, but all countries united with one mission to create and maintain peace. The United Nations should become the umbrella under, which we negotiate peace. While all member states, not only the US and the EU should be responsible for peace or to extent their influence, using only their voice, also China, Russia and all the other countries should be allowed to have their say in the security councils, even the smallest ones.
I believe that to repair the damages everyone has done. All the politicians that went or supported any of the wars, have their hands bloody including me. Especially, me. Because in striving to achieve peace, I have started the war in Afghanistan again with the UN, which is even worse than the others. Because I believed that the taliban are the devil worshipers and that there are horrible things going to happen to the people of Afghanistan. But we must stop killing now. All of it. It is a sin to kill. Even the enemy. And than we will find a way to peace, which will not be bloody at all. This is the trick of how we will find our way to peace. We can start with the less strong position of power. I think we should try and see, if the Ukrainians stop killing the Russians that are attacking them and all countries stop the support to the Ukraine with guns and open the lines of communication with Russia and give them a chance to speak than we can start the path to peace. We need to bring the Russia back to the United Nations.
In the same way it should be done in Palestine. Both parties should be told they aren’t allowed to kill and the Palestinians should start throwing down the wall, just like we did during the Berlin wall and by doing so standing up to the Israelis armies that have came to fight them. I think in the Palestine and Israeli conflict, it is that we need to stop looking to governments for solution and that the citizens of both the Palestinian and Israelian countries should start to throw down the walls separating them and be reunited as brothers and sisters. Not seeking retribution through violent means, but through forgiveness and reconciliation. By doing so they can show to God and the politicians that we are all just brothers and sisters before God no matter the religion or country they belong to and that they don’t care who is leading them, however they will take their power into their own hands in order to achieve peace and throw down the wall separating them. The money and retribution will be brought through institutions we have available to preserve peace and through the acts of law.
I propose, that we should strive towards achieving global peace through the United Nations and all member states should put it into their constitution that it isn’t allowed to kill in the name of peace. As if we look into Christian religion it is a sin to kill for any human even the evil people, we can try and save them from committing horrendous acts through negotiation, through a conversation, through law and understanding. And maybe just maybe we should stop giving people the Nobel prize.
In that moment when the countries will pledge to eliminate all armies and pledge that all disputes will be handled through the United Nations we can work towards achieving peace. We will wash the blood of our hands. At first, I thought, we need to give the United Nations a large army to prevent human rights violations, but I am not sure, if we should do that. We need to design the United Nations in a way it promotes and maintains peace, however first through different means of negotiation, and justice system and not through killing. I would like to phase out veto, as it is biased by the default and allow all of the countries of this world to have their say through voting. It could be that in some larger countries could have a few more votes, but not in the way it is now where all the largest countries in the world fight for power over the United Nations tipping mostly towards US and EU countries, which is biased by default.
However, how large the army of the United Nations should be, if we should have the army at all is questionable. When the fiasco in Afghanistan happened and it was my fault that it has happened. I wanted all the member states of the United Nations to outsource all their armies to the United Nations, which could and in fact should become the largest army in the world (since all the other armies should be phased out), in order to fight against human rights violations. Stupid beyond measure. In this case, if we give the army to the United Nations, they will fight against the human rights violations again with guns, which could result in another genocide and what has happened so far in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria. However, at the same time this has provided us with a pathway towards achieving heaven and peace on earth. Because, if we give all the armies to the United Nations and pledge for peace there will be no reason for one single country to attack another one. But EVEN if we do this, we have to make sure that we stop fighting the human rights violations (if they ever even existed in the first place) and to preserve the democracy and peace with guns. We need to find better ways towards peace, preservation of human rights and democracy and I believe the pathway forward is through law, talking and negotiation and NOT WITH GUNS.
If we phase out all armies around the world and give the United Nations an army that is designed differently than current armies that are designed to win the war and dominate over the oppressor then we can maybe get to peace or maintain peace in non violent means. Even if the human rights violations will happen the United Nations should lastly respond by sending them armies, if they should send them at all. We should come up with a plan on how the UN could respond in cases of escalation and tailor in different solutions that the countries should implement to achieve that.
In this moment the world will hopefully receive a final global Nobel prize, including all those politicians who will pledge to support the peace. Because, the Nobel prize has been created on the wrong pretences, since in order to achieve the Nobel prize something bad as a war must happen for you to receive it and I believe it is time that we give humanity a chance to finally wash the blood of the sir. Nobels fingers and stop killing all together in the name of peace or if we can strive towards it all together. Because why would we need to go to war to get to peace? Why? There are other ways and solutions we can use in order to achieve peace.
Change-design.org 